Thoughts On Active Viewership:
1)Age relations: The first debate – Trump is seventy, Clinton sixty-eight. Nixon was forty-seven, Kennedy forty-three.
A biographical timeline ticker running throughout the debate. Can anyone say they relate to either H.C. or D.T. ? In seeing the ages and actions of each candidate as they moved throughout their life, I believe voters of all ages will be able to entrench or change their political stance as we advance the humanization the candidates. Age is an incredibly identifiable trait, let’s make some headlines to show what was going on the voters and the candidates were at the same age place in their lives.
Age 21, 1968: Hillary Clinton – Thesis on Saul Alinsky
Writes her senior thesis about Saul Alinsky: “There Is Only the Fight: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” Saul Alinsky’s organizing skills were focused on improving the living conditions of poor communities across America. In the 1950s, he began turning his attention to improving conditions in the African-American ghettos, beginning with Chicago’s and later traveling to other ghettos in California, Michigan, New York City, and a dozen other “trouble spots”.
Age 26, May 1973: Hillary Clinton — Receives Juris Doctor degree from Yale Law School, where she served on the editorial board of the Yale Review of Law and Social Action. During her second year, she worked at the Yale Child Study Center.
Age 27, October 1973: Donald Trump – Trump organization charged with violating Fair Housing act. The U.S. Justice Department sues the Trump Organization, charging that it frequently violated the Fair Housing Act by discriminating against potential black buyers.U.S. Justice Department V.S. Trump
Age 27, 1973: Donald Trump – Forever A Smoking Gun
“The younger Trump demonstrated the brash, combative style that would make him famous, holding forth at a news conference in a Manhattan hotel to decry the government’s arguments as “such outrageous lies.” He would also say that the company wanted to avoid renting apartments to welfare recipients of any color but never discriminated based on race.”
Age 70, 2016: Donald Trump: Asserts debate are rigged against him
In a series of interviews over the past week, the Republican nominee has asserted that “the system is being rigged” against him. The first of three scheduled debates between Trump and Hillary Clinton will be held on Sept. 26, with NBC’s Lester Holt as the journalist questioning the candidates. “I think it’s terrible,” Trump told Fox News Channel over the weekend. “They want the host to go after Trump.”
2) Rhetoric v.s. Rhetoric: Appeal to decency – Can we unite under parts of the democratic platform?
“Among Democrats, 78 percent say they have a favorable view of Clinton, lower than the 89 percent favorability rating Obama had at this point in the race in 2012. Clinton’s favorability drops to 28 percent among independents versus Obama’s 47 percent.” “Most of us around here will vote Democratic, we always do, but we’re not overly enthusiastic for Clinton,” said resident Pablo Marron. “But we are united in our opposition to Trump.” – Fortune Magazine 26 Sept, 2016
In quickly and artistically (DataVis, Artful design, Curated quoting) juxtaposing the actual diction of the campaigns we will be able to take down the seductive macho ascetic of language used by the republican campaign and unpack the political platform of the other democratic and third parties.
“Making new investments to support state-of-the-art law enforcement training programs at every level on issues like use of force, de-escalation, community policing and problem solving, alternatives to incarceration, crisis intervention, and officer safety and wellness. To successfully reform our criminal justice system, we must work to strengthen the bonds of trust between our communities and our police, end the era of mass incarceration, and ensure a successful transition of individuals from prison to home. As president, Hillary will focus on a few key areas.”
“The police in our country do not get respect. Our law enforcement officers deserve our appreciation for the incredible job they do.”
3) Active viewership as protest: a new type of activism and or/ a new type of art activism.
who are the artists, researchers and organisers interested in exchanging experiences, program, technology, software and visions in the field of synestesia, experimental film and video, digital video, live video connected to theatre, dance and music.
By actively refuting the talking points, by actively comparing them to failed platform statements, by actively saying “No” to the redundant policy themes of education system reform, lower corporate tax rates, moving away from fossil fuels, immigration policy reform – by using the “art of resistance” (in our case, resistance to the doctrine of the debate by way of “re-mix”) we can create an exchange between art and in modern political organizing, in both the instant digital world and the faster paced actuation of political organization in the physical world.
Within moments of heated political energy, we can mobilize not just in the physical world, as seen in the way that social media played a role in the 2011 Egyptian Revolutions, but we can continue to deepen, reorganize, morph, and entrench the way we mobilize online. If we imagine the way that popular opinion and social media have played a part in modern political campaigns/political climate/political analysis/post political event reflection, (Troktiko of Greece, 18 Days In Egypt), we can see that activism is being put in the hands of those who are within the event itself and who can now create the artistic reflection and artistic representation of the event. The citizens will decide what is truth and we will not continue to be subject to the media’s interpretation of events and its proselytizing effect. We will decide how this picture is painted.
Ultra-Red describes this action as “The art of resistance,” a practice that, like traditional and institutional art, has its own set of aesthetic and operational frameworks.